Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

West-Leuer, B. (2009). Colonial Aggression and Collective Aggressor Trauma. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 90(5):1157-1168.

(2009). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 90(5):1157-1168

Film Essays

Colonial Aggression and Collective Aggressor Trauma

Beate West-Leuer

Introduction

Colonialism and imperialism have not only left their mark on the ethnonational group identities of their victims, but also on the group identity of the aggressors. El Dorado (1988) by Carlos Saura, a film about the Spanish conqueror Lope de Aguirre, shows the effects on the psyche of the Spanish conquistadors. The politics of colonial and imperial expansion were carried out in the name of a reputedly superior civilization of higher morals without the least consideration for any injustice towards the South American natives. There are numerous parallels throughout the world even today.

A successful cinematic rendering of such ethnonational aggression and collective aggressor trauma can activate mechanisms for processing the events within an audience which elicit feelings of collective shame and guilt and contribute to reparation (see Volkan, 1999). I understand ‘aggressor traumata’ to be the personal and collective ‘precipitates’ which result when individual acts of aggression progress into a national destructive drive. Freud saw the destructive drive as having the goal of destroying life. As a variant of the death drive it protects the collective from self-aggressive behaviour by destroying what is foreign (see Freud, 1933). The external enemy unifies the group internally. The leaders and their followers, who annihilate the external enemy, act in the name of the collective. By collectively taking advantage of the absence or only partial presence of a superego, the temporary disempowerment or even the complete destruction of a conscience, traumatic changes in the psyches of the aggressors are set in motion.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.