Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Katz, M. (2012). Field Theory. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 93(3):743-744.

(2012). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 93(3):743-744

Field Theory Related Papers

Montana Katz

The first presentation was by Elsa Rappoport de Aisemberg on The theory of the analytic field, which began by discussing the history of the psychoanalytic perspective on countertransference, seen firstly as an obstacle and secondly as a tool for understanding preverbal elements in the patient's communications. The third stage, a broader use of countertransference than the previous two, was initiated by Willy and Madeleine Baranger in the 1960s. The Barangers described this broader use in their model of the analytic field and related concepts, such as the basic fantasy of the field and its ‘bastions’ or blockages. Aisemberg noted that other psychoanalysts developed this concept of the analytic field, including a reformulation by Madeleine Baranger in 2004.

Aisemberg discussed how, in the patient—analyst encounter, the patient transfers something of the original experience with primary objects. It is to this that the analyst listens and it also becomes part of the material of the countertransference. The analytic setting is asymmetrical, and its force contributes to the symbolic level. A structure is formed between analyst and patient in the analytic situation; this is a ‘third’. By means of the third, the shared emotional experience is transformed into an analytic object. In turn, this paves the way for a construction in the analyst's mind. This is the source of the analyst's intervention in the transference. Within the model of the analytic field, Aisemberg noted, there is a circulation between the intrapsychic and intersubjectivity.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.