Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Birksted-Breen, D. (2013). Editorial. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 94(3):425-429.

(2013). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 94(3):425-429

Editorial

Dana Birksted-Breen

Avant l'oeuvre, oeuvre d'art, oeuvre d'écriture, oeuvre de parole,

il n'y a pas d'artiste, ni d'écrivain, ni

de sujet parlant, puisque c'est

la production qui produit le producteur,

le faisant naǐtre ou apparaǐtre en le prouvant.

(Maurice Blanchot, 1983, pp. 85-6)

A year into the establishment of the new Editorial Board, the International Journal welcomes the opportunity to look back at developments over the last year and forward to new possibilities, as well as reflect on the defining values and outlook of the Journal.

A core concern of the International Journal is the creative space between tradition and change, where development stems from psychoanalytic foundations in a dialectical movement of returning to the past and looking forward. Probing the limits of psychoanalysis, as editor I try to stay attentive to the questions - what is the psychoanalytical? Where are its parameters? When does it become so changed that it is no longer psychoanalysis? These are not simple questions and need constant discussion if our profession is to retain its solid foundation, providing a frame for creativity. Innovation emerges from previously established parameters and resides in specific, sometimes subtle, shifts in thought. Speaking of the developments that take place in the consulting room, but also in theoretical thought, Jean Laplanche identifies a dialectic between “centering” and “recentering” (Laplanche, 1999, pp. 2, 67), where critique remains internal to the economy of Freudian thought and metapsychological concepts, but also other to it, revising rather than rejecting the past.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.