Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: PEP-Web Archive subscribers can access past articles and books…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you are a PEP-Web Archive subscriber, you have access to all journal articles and books, except for articles published within the last three years, with a few exceptions.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bronstein, C. (2014). On the Excess of Nothing: Discussion of J.-B. Pontalis, ‘No, Twice No’. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 95(3):563-571.
    

(2014). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 95(3):563-571

On the Excess of Nothing: Discussion of J.-B. Pontalis, ‘No, Twice No

Catalina Bronstein

(Accepted for publication 10 May 2014)

With this fine, sophisticated, intellectually challenging and elegantly written article, Pontalis brings to our attention some of the issues that have both theoretically and clinically occupied a central place in analytic thinking and practice - and still do.

Pontalis first traces the development of the concept of ‘negative therapeutic reaction’ (NTR) in Freud, making some important points. He addresses Freud's notion of the NTR as a “force” that is “defending itself by every possible means against recovery and which is absolutely resolved to hold on to illness and suffering” (Freud, 1937, p. 242). His point is that Freud talks about NTR as if it was a war, using a military metaphor that appears to allude to an admission of defeat.

Pontalis then presents us with a brief survey, where he looks at the ‘arms’ and instruments used by psychoanalysis to understand and tame this force that he defines, and which can be summarized as: (1) the libidinal satisfaction found in the symptom involving the primary and secondary gains of the disease, which Pontalis describes as the ‘secret jousissance’ behind the symptom or the bonus of pleasure that accompanies it, as well as the suspicion brought by a possible ‘flight into health'; (2) Freud's development of the second topography (structural model), with the notions of the sense of guilt ('unpleasure for the ego, gratification for the

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.