Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view.  What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Feldman, M. (2014). Comments on Lucy LaFarge's Paper How and Why Unconscious Phantasy and Transference are the Defining Features of Psychoanalytic Practice. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 95(6):1279-1281.

(2014). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 95(6):1279-1281

Comments on Lucy LaFarge's Paper How and Why Unconscious Phantasy and Transference are the Defining Features of Psychoanalytic Practice Related Papers

Michael Feldman

(Accepted for publication 26 September 2014)

The author's outline of the model of the psychoanalytic process is admirably clear and convincing. However, I find myself less agreement with the way the model is applied to the fascinating clinical material and the interaction with the analyst she presents.

The clinical vignette begins with the first session of the week in which the woman patient, a junior academic, says she has been thinking all the way to the session about being left out of the departmental Christmas party. There had been no place for her at the table sitting with a couple. The man of the couple has been awarded a prize for his work. She then began a familiar lament - he had everything, he was leaving her behind because she was so unsuccessful, such a failure.

The analyst had a striking response to this material - she felt drawn into “an intense identification” with the patient, recalling a personal experience of rejection from the past. The analyst's first intervention attempted to express her understanding of the patient's experience of rejection, viewing herself as inferior. The patient replied that what the analyst had said was exactly what she was thinking: it was “almost as if you were speaking my thoughts from inside my mind”.

The patient went on to emphasize that the analyst was “so on track”, “hit it just right”, “such a moment of connectedness”. She wished she was as smart as the analyst, she could not speak or write so perfectly, and she would never be as successful in her work as the analyst.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.