Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access “The Standard Edition” of Freud’s work…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can directly access Strachey’s The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud through the Books tab on the left side of the PEP-Web screen.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Blass, R.B. Carmeli, Z. (2015). Further Evidence for the Case against Neuropsychoanalysis: How Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou's Response to Our Critique Confirms the Irrelevance and Harmfulness to Psychoanalysis of the Contemporary Neuroscientific Trend. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 96(6):1555-1573.

(2015). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 96(6):1555-1573

Further Evidence for the Case against Neuropsychoanalysis: How Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou's Response to Our Critique Confirms the Irrelevance and Harmfulness to Psychoanalysis of the Contemporary Neuroscientific Trend Language Translation

Rachel B. Blass and Zvi Carmeli

(Accepted for publication 16 October 2015)

In their paper “The case for neuropsychoanalysis” Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou (2015) respond to our critique of neuropsychoanalysis (Blass & Carmeli, 2007), setting forth evidence and arguments which, they claim, demonstrate why neuroscience is relevant and important for psychoanalysis and hence why dialogue between the fields is necessary. In the present paper we carefully examine their evidence and arguments and demonstrate how and why their claim is completely mistaken. In fact, Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou's paper only confirms our position on the irrelevance and harmfulness to psychoanalysis of the contemporary neuroscientific trend. We show how this trend perverts the essential nature of psychoanalysis and of how it is practiced. The clinical impact and its detrimental nature is highlighted by discussion of clinical material presented by Yovell et al (2015). In the light of this we argue that the debate over neuropsychoanalysis should be of interest to all psychoanalysts, not only those concerned with biology or interdisciplinary dialogue.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.