Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To review an author’s works published in PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Author Section is a useful way to review an author’s works published in PEP-Web. It is ordered alphabetically by the Author’s surname. After clicking the matching letter, search for the author’s full name.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Press, J. (2016). Metapsychological and Clinical Issues in Psychosomatics Research. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 97(1):89-113.

(2016). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(1):89-113

Contemporary Conversations

Metapsychological and Clinical Issues in Psychosomatics Research Related Papers Language Translation

Jacques Press

(Accepted for publication 26 October 2014)

The last few years have witnessed a renewal of interest in psychosomatics in English-language literature, as evinced by the publication in the International Journal of a number of papers (e.g. Aisenstein, 2006; Lombardi, 2008; Solano, 2010; Pirlot and Corcos, 2012) and the translation of Marty's essay on the narcissistic difficulties presented by the psychosomatic problem (Marty, 2010), as well as the simultaneous publication of three contributions each illustrating a different approach to the subject (Bronstein, 2011; Smadja, 2011; Fischbein, 2011). While so to speak engaging in an indirect dialogue with several of these authors, the present publication adopts what I believe to be a relatively novel perspective, concentrating on the epistemological and clinical issues arising in the process of theorization in the psychosomatic field. What is the relationship between a theory and the clinical practice for which it seeks to account? What is the purpose of our theories? These questions obviously arise for every psychoanalyst, given that our activity does not readily lend itself to the classical scientific model's verification procedures. However, as I shall endeavour to show, these problems are not only particularly acute in the sphere of psychosomatics, but also constitute an essential first step in testing the value of our theories. My argument will be presented in four stages.

I shall begin with a general review of the links between theory and clinical practice.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.