Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Balsam, R. (2016). Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Man: Psychoanalysis and Masculinity by Donald Moss Routledge, London, 2012; 150 pp + xxii; $36.85. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 97(5):1439-1444.

(2016). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(5):1439-1444

Book and Journal Reviews

Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Man: Psychoanalysis and Masculinity by Donald Moss Routledge, London, 2012; 150 pp + xxii; $36.85

Review by:
Rosemary Balsam

Donald Moss MD, the seasoned New York based psychoanalyst, has brought his full attention and his exciting writing voices to the complexity of men and ‘masculinity’. The author of Hating in the first person plural: Psychoanalytic essays on racism, homophobia, misogyny, and terror (2003), known for his deep concern for and writings about troubled modern society's ills, including the abject ethics of the death penalty (in sum, civilization and its discontents), writes philosophically, at times soaringly, and always with rhetorical muscle on parallels between homophobia and misogyny; the evocation of hatred in the culture towards gays and transsexuals; and the evils of a unitary tough ‘masculinity’ that can stand for being ‘a man’. What can that saturated noun ‘masculinity’ possibly mean both socioculturally and in our work as psychoanalysts, he asks. Expectably, there is no answer. Employing his self-interrogatory writing voice, each question the author asks seems to draw the reader further into a maze of complexity and density, evoked by his ‘cascade’ (to use one of his signal words) of ideas, images, contradictions, abstractions and fevered paradoxes. A different writing voice shows up in his clinical work - bringing his patients to life, deftly drawing us into their conflicts in an orderly fashion, exposing their bold fantasies, their prides, their pained longings, their miseries, failures and self hatreds, sharing his interpretations and interventions with their varying impact.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.