Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To sort articles by Rankā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Blass, R. (2019). Response to Jay Greenberg's letter. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 100(1):150-151.

(2019). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 100(1):150-151

Response to Jay Greenberg's letter

Rachel Blass

Jay Greenberg opens his letter with the claim that my characterization of him as “a leading figure in American Relational psychoanalysis” (Blass, 2018, 950) is factually inaccurate. I find this strange since his central role in the development of that field is universally acknowledged, including by Greenberg himself, most recently in an interview published in a book of essays by “eminent relational thinkers” (Aron, Grand & Slochower, 2018, 3). Greenberg is also well aware that many analysts maintain, to this day, that he “represents the relational point of view” (Greenberg & Aron, 2018, 35) and regard him as “a relationalist” (ibid., 47) or “an exponent of relational psychoanalysis” (Scarfone, 2010, 984). However, as emphasized in Greenberg's letter, there are analysts (himself included) who do not identify him as relational. Since in my single-line presentation of the authors in this section I aimed to mention only brief and basic facts in consensus, I commented on Greenberg being a leading figure in the relational field and not on whether he currently is (or is not) a relational psychoanalyst.

Greenberg goes on to assume that mischaracterization of him as a relational analyst “certainly” shaped my reading of what he wrote and led me, through intellectually dishonest means and because of my limitations (as expressed in what he believes is my use of an overvalued idea), to misportray his position and then overgeneralize it.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.