Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Auerhahn, N. (2016). "I Could Eat You Up:" Philomela, Trauma, and Enactment. IJP Open, 3:78.

(2016). IJP Open, 3:78

"I Could Eat You Up:" Philomela, Trauma, and Enactment

Nanette Auerhahn

The following paper explores how trauma that is neither symbolized nor represented is made known to self and other. How do we tell ourselves and others what has happened to us when formulation is elusive and when knowing, making known, and being known bring terror? For instruction, we turn to the myth of Philomela and discover a paradigm for taking possession of traumatic knowledge via enactments that engage the other/therapist who feels with the survivor. The action in the story of Philomela turns around cannibalism which is shown to be an apt metaphor for visceral affective knowing and for recruitment of the body in the metabolization of trauma. Clinical examples illustrate the vicissitudes of trauma as it follows the path of action/enactment first and only then creation of a narrative.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.