Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access the PEP-Web Facebook page…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

PEP-Web has a Facebook page! You can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gieseke, W.D. (2019). RESPONSE TO JUDITH RUSTIN AND HEATHER FERGUSON’S “EXTENDING THE EMPATHIC GRASP IN THE TREATMENT OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA: ADDING A NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE”. Psychoanal. Self. Cxt., 14(3):317-322.

(2019). Psychoanalysis, Self, and Context, 14(3):317-322

RESPONSE TO JUDITH RUSTIN AND HEATHER FERGUSON’S “EXTENDING THE EMPATHIC GRASP IN THE TREATMENT OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA: ADDING A NEUROSCIENCE PERSPECTIVE”

William D. Gieseke, Ph.D.

Judith Rustin and Heather Ferguson’s article has two theses. The first thesis is that an understanding of neuroscience can help to convey a broader sense of empathy for the patient’s subjective experience. The second thesis is that an understanding of the neuroscience “brackets” or holds the therapist’s anxiety and their patient’s anxiety “in check.” This article makes a strong case for these theses. I question whether these two functions are enough to recommend adding a neuroscience perspective to the treatment of our patients. I would suggest it is not! My thesis is that only by using our knowledge of neuroscience to engage the brain/mind in the treatment will our therapeutic efforts have their most significant power and efficacy.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.