Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Boesky, D. (1975). Correspondence with Miss Joyce Carol Oates. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 2:481-486.

(1975). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 2:481-486

Correspondence with Miss Joyce Carol Oates

Dale Boesky

The fascination and profound respect with which Freud approached his psychoanalytic studies of literature was echoed in the enthusiastic response of many serious writers to issues of mutual interest to psychoanalysts and the creative artist. The subsequent history of applied psychoanalysis has unfortunately been sometimes turbulent because of important misunderstandings of psychoanalytic issues on the part of writers and literary critics but also because of some facile and clumsy perceptions of serious literary work on the part of psychoanalysts.

After a recent opportunity to hear the noted American writer, Joyce Carol Oates, discussing some of these issues, I wrote to her about certain questions which relate to the methodology of applied psychoanalysis and literature and found her responses to be so stimulating that I concluded they should be brought to the attention of the psychoanalytic community. In the interests of increasing the coherence of certain passages in these two remarkable letters I have included the relevant excerpts from my own rather lengthy letters which will clarify the context of her responses.

21 September 1973

Dear Miss Oates,

I think a good point at which to begin your reactions and comments about issues relating to literature and psychoanalysis would be to reexamine an assumption which was initially novel but has become widely accepted. I refer to the notion that it is valid for a psychoanalyst to approach an understanding of a literary character just as though the character were 'real'.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.