Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Heynick, F. (1981). Linguistic Aspects of Freud's Dream Model. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 8:299-314.
   

(1981). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 8:299-314

Linguistic Aspects of Freud's Dream Model

Frank Heynick

SUMMARY

Freud's explicit recognition in the Traumdeutung of the existence of abundant verbal material in dreams, and his implicit recognition of the high degree of grammaticality which characterizes it, seems to have posed a theoretical problem for his overall dream model: How can an apparently logico-grammatical (=secondary) process be operating effectively within the framework of primary-process dreaming? (Or, in modern Chomskyan terms: How can the strictly-defined formal transformational rules for sentence generation be applied so correctly and consistently within the dream-work, whose 'rules' for the generation of the manifest dream from the dream-thoughts are notoriously ill-defined and haphazardly applied?)

Freud sought to resolve this apparent anomaly by degrading (what is today called) 'linguistic competence' in dreams by denying any novel aspect to dream-speeches, viewing them rather as 'replays' of utterances heard or spoken previously in waking life and 'recorded' in memory.

But Freud also acknowledged that some dream-speeches have not been uttered previously in exactly the same form in waking life. This presented a theoretical problem less amenable to a satisfying solution. here too, he sought to minimalize the role of linguistic competence: by postulating this verbal material to be the product of 'editing' and 'intersplicing' of the 'memory sound-tracks'. Furthermore, he attributed this editing largely to secondary revision, which, according to one theoretical alternative, can be viewed as 'a contribution from waking thought', rather than part of the dream-work proper.

The remainder of the present paper seeks to view Freud's model of verbal behaviour in dreams in the light of recent, rather meagre, research. More importantly, it endeavours to point the way to future research in this area which, in turn, may have implications for Freud's overall dream theory.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.