Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To report problems to PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Help us improve PEP Web. If you find any problem, click the Report a Problem link located at the bottom right corner of the website.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Margolis, N.M. (1982). Freud and the Principle of Complementarity. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 9:487-488.

(1982). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 9:487-488

Freud and the Principle of Complementarity

Norman M. Margolis, M.D.

DEAR SIR,

Your readers who have been stimulated by the Devereux (1980) communication on Freud and the principle of complementarity, and the letter in response by Rothenberg (1982), will be interested in an earlier paper published on this subject by Edelheit (1976), a reference omitted by both Devereux and Rothenberg.

In this wide-ranging and thoughtful study, Edelheit discusses the historical, epistemologic, and theoretical significance of this principle to psychoanalysis specifically, and psychology in general, through an investigation of Hughlings Jackson's comparable formulations and their place in Freud's ultimate conceptualizations.

Sincerely

REFERENCES

DEVEREUX, G. 1980 Freud, discoverer of the principle of complementarity Int. J. Psychoanal.. 7:521 [→]

EEDELHEIT, H. 1976 Complementarity as a rule in psychological research: Freud, Jackson and the mind/body problem Int. J. Psychoanal. 57:23-29 [→]

ROTHENBERG, A. 1982 Letter to the editor Int. J. Psychoanal.. 9:104-105 [→]

Article Citation [Who Cited This?]

Margolis, N.M. (1982). Freud and the Principle of Complementarity. Int. Rev. Psycho-Anal., 9:487-488

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.