Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Davison, W.T. (1984). Reflections on the Mutative Interpretation, Defence Analysis, and Self Analysis. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 11:143-149.

(1984). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 11:143-149

Reflections on the Mutative Interpretation, Defence Analysis, and Self Analysis

Walter T. Davison

SUMMARY

James Strachey's concept of the mutative interpretation is updated by contributions from Anna Freud, Paul Gray, Merton Gill, Heinz Kohut, and others. Defence analysis is challenging to analysts but such a focus has definite advantages. To be able to infer defences the analyst must tune a portion of his attention to changes in quality, quantity, or object of affect on a moment-to-moment basis. Focusing analysis around moments of feeling change that analysands can learn to recognize inside and outside the analyst's office offers them a better opportunity to be their own analyst at any moment because defences are always with us unlike parapraxes, dreams, and other observable signs of intrapsychic conflict. The building of the capacity to be one's own analyst is an important analytic goal.

some disadvantages of defence analysis are mentioned.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.