Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Steiner, J. (1985). Turning a Blind Eye: The Cover up for Oedipus. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 12:161-172.

(1985). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 12:161-172

Turning a Blind Eye: The Cover up for Oedipus

John Steiner


Philip Vellacott's study of Sophocles and Oedipus is used to suggest that both the play and the Oedipus complex need to be understood at two levels simultaneously. In the classical view Oedipus is a victim of fate and bravely pursues the truth. Freud likened this to the course of an analysis where the unconscious is gradually revealed to the patient. At the same time Sophocles seems to intend us to understand that the chief characters in the play must have been aware of the identity of Oedipus and realized that he had committed parricide and incest. There is some ambiguity about the degree of awareness of this knowledge and in the paper I put forward the view that each of the participants, for their own reasons turned a blind eye to it so that a cover-up was staged.

In the same way, a modern view of the Oedipus complex would not replace the classical view but complement it. Oedipal conflicts are universal and do not in themselves account for pathology. The view is put forward that a pathological resolution of the Oedipus complex arises when the psychic reality of these impulses is denied and a cover-up of a perverse kind results.

It is suggested that turning a blind eye is an important mechanism which leads to a misrepresentation and distortion of psychic reality.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.