Kennedy, R. (1986). My Kleinian Home: By Nini Herman. London: Quartet Books. 1985. Pp. 146.. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 13:250..

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1986). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 13:250-251

My Kleinian Home: By Nini Herman. London: Quartet Books. 1985. Pp. 146.

Review by: Roger Kennedy Author Information

This book is a vivid account of a psychiatrist's life, told mainly through experience of three therapies—with a Jungian, Freudian and finally a Kleinian analyst, which she found by far the most satisfactory. Before reading the book, I had a number of concerns and questions, many of which remained with me after I had read it. These were to do with the problematic nature of such an autobiography, the description of an analysis by the analysand. For example, although such an account may give valuable insight into what it feels like to be a patient, does it provide anything more substantial, such as insight into the process itself? And, then, how much of the account can the reader simply believe, given how difficult it is to differentiate the real person of the analyst from his phantasy aspects? Is the account itself a piece of acting out, for example, is it designed to show up or over-praise the analyst, and is thus a consequence of an unresolved or unanalysed transfere

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2010, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.