Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To search for a specific phrase…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you write an article’s title and the article did not appear in the search results? Or do you want to find a specific phrase within the article? Go to the Search section and write the title or phrase surrounded by quotations marks in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Turner, J. (1988). Wordsworth and Winnicott in the Area of Play. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 15:481-496.
  

(1988). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 15:481-496

Wordsworth and Winnicott in the Area of Play

John Turner

SUMMARY

This paper traces the cultural origins of Winnicott's concern with creativity and play to the discovery (or rediscovery) of imagination amongst the Romantic poets after the disillusion of their youthful revolutionary hopes. It shows how the imaginative power to transform the world was discovered in the failure to transform it politically; it champions Wordsworth's poetic interest in the relationships sustained by mental imagery over Coleridge's more famous philosophical interest in the faculty of imagination; and it discusses the profound affinity between Wordsworth's understanding of poetry and Winnicott's understanding of play—an affinity which is partly a diffused influence, since the cultured world of Winnicott's youth retained the high Romantic evaluation of imaginative activity, and partly an effect of their common hostility to the post-Cartesian division of experience into the categories of subjective and objective. Such division ignores the 'potential space' between the two, the space of play and poetry, of image, metaphor and symbol—a space which our common language is ill-equipped to explore. My paper therefore emphasizes the importance of paradox to both Wordsworth and Winnicott: for in so far as they were free of universalist habits of thought, religious or psychoanalytical, paradox enabled them to subvert scientistic categories of thought and celebrate the poetry of the relational in our experience.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.