Login
Marill, I.H. (1991). The Tin Drum: A Cinematic Portrayal of an Oedipal Tyrant. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 18:541-553.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1991). International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 18:541-553

The Tin Drum: A Cinematic Portrayal of an Oedipal Tyrant

Irwin H. Marill, M.D. Author Information

From a psychoanalytic point of view, The Tin Drum is a story about an 'oedipal tyrant' who presents himself as a parricide. The narrative, in the form of an allegory, tells the story of a child who refuses to grow up in order not to join the world of adult perversity. While this is the ostensible theme, my discussion will highlight the paradox in this film which, at the same time, shows the child to be the exemplar of perverse thinking and behaviour. I believe the author has emphasized this absurdity in order artistically to dramatize the truth of childhood polymorphous perversity, as the prologue to adult depravity, when development and circumstances go awry. In this story, the child is simultaneously the grand protester and the mirror of the perverse world.

In my view, oedipal issues are emphasized in the screenplay for good reason as the central, organizing pathway for the raging childhood issues of envy, jealousy, rivalry, magical omnipotence, compensatory grandiosity, and ultimately parricide. What better platform for all these human phenomena than the Nazi period! Another paradox I will comment on is the well-known psychoanalytic view that mental parricide is the very stuff from which oedipal resolution and 'growing up' can evolve. Fortunately for the child in this film, the option of growth is presented as an outcome of his turbulent oedipal struggle. Regardless of what interpretive position one takes of this film, the viewer comes away with a feeling that something

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.