Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To open articles without exiting the current webpage…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To open articles without exiting your current search or webpage, press Ctrl + Left Mouse Button while hovering over the desired link. It will open in a new Tab in your internet browser.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Eisenberg, A.M. (1997). Institutional Countertransference: The Matrix of Social Structure and Psychic Structure. J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 25(2):237-254.
  

(1997). Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 25(2):237-254

Institutional Countertransference: The Matrix of Social Structure and Psychic Structure

Allan M. Eisenberg, PH.D.*

No longer the “dirty little secret” of psychoanalysis, countertransference has become respectable. A psychological phenomenon that was formerly seen as an impediment to psychoanalytic work is now considered an important tool in the therapist's armamentarium. Appreciation of the usefulness of countertransference has come hand-in-hand with an expansion of its meaning and range of application. Many contemporary therapists now consider countertransference to include their total emotional responses to their patients, finding too limited the earlier view that confined countertransference to the therapist's unconscious reaction to the patient's transference.

In this broad sense, countertransference encompassing the full range of emotional and behavioral responses to patients, has been discussed intermittently as one of the complicating factors in the care of patients in institutional settings. The complication is immediately evident—the therapist's dictum to “monitor one's countertransference” becomes a more daunting enterprise when the “therapist” in question may be a hydra-headed treatment team with innumerable countertransference reactions in the heads of each of its members. When one adds to the multitude of emotional reactions to any patient the multitude of staff reactions to other staff members, one has an exceedingly complex web in which treatment is to take place. The effort to provide coherence and consistency of treatment to patients is perhaps the central challenge in institutional care, in part because such care is delivered through the vehicle of many personalities, many persons, each responding to a given patient in his or her own unique fashion.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.