Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kestenbaum, C.J. (2006). Reminiscences of a Training Director and the Future of Training Programs. J. Amer. Acad. Psychoanal., 34(1):29-41.

(2006). Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 34(1):29-41

Reminiscences of a Training Director and the Future of Training Programs

Clarice J. Kestenbaum, M.D.

Psychiatric education in the United States has undergone vast changes during the past 40 years, from a classical psychoanalytic model to an evi-dence-based neurobiological paradigm. Training standards, set by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medial Education, have brought more scientific rigor to the training of young psychiatrists, but the danger of losing the psychotherapeutic skills provided in the past by long-term psychodynamic supervision is of concern to many psychiatric educators. A model for evaluating competence in psychodynamic psychiatry is discussed and postgraduate psychoanalytic training is encouraged.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.