Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Adair, M.J. (2000). A Response to Drs. Dorpat, Rangell, and Margolis. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 9(2):243-253.

(2000). Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 9(2):243-253

A Response to Drs. Dorpat, Rangell, and Margolis Related Papers

Dr. Mark J. Adair, Ph.D.

By Homer's time, Western man had already partitioned the psyche from the soma and had begun, moreover, to invest this psyche with autonomy. A body-mind duality, in other words, had infected ancient psychology. Homer's psyches were, admittedly, poor things. Stripped by death of their mortal frames, the souls of heroes wandered the House of Hades as weak, passive, squeaking shades. Inevitably, however, the psyche grew stronger. The passage of three hundred years made it positively robust, and in the form of Plato's vó0σ (nous) the mind then possessed such independence from the body as to be able by its own philosophical exertions to become divine. The next twenty-four hundred years of Western contemplation, Whitehead's “series of footnotes to Plato,” preserved this vexatious duality. So even today, despite our best efforts, we are helplessly dualist and chase the right answers to the wrong questions.

The scholarly responses to my paper have sharpened my thinking, and in that process exposed my collusion in this search. Bewitched by dualism I too have asked, What is the “puzzling leap” between the mental and the physical? The question so phrased evokes images of a gap, a dark area, or a synapse between two disparate systems. These are metaphors, I know; but they are treacherous metaphors which mislead us into thinking there is a body separate from mind even when we know there is only a unitary, continuous bodymind.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.