Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size?  In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+).  Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out).   To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command  on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Meyers, H.C. (2000). Discussion of Dr. Dunn's Case. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 9(4):503-510.

(2000). Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 9(4):503-510

Discussion of Dr. Dunn's Case

Helen C. Meyers, M.D.

Having discussed so much of our general theoretical and technical positions in the previous panel, we will have the luxury of addressing the clinical material presented to us in more detail, as well as indulge in some more speculative ideas.

The two cases presented to us by Dr. Epstein and Dr. Dunn, I believe, are quite different in their psychic organizations, although on the surface they have a good deal in common. Both patients describe mother as sickly and critical and yet manifest unusual closeness between themselves and mother—both patients call mother almost every day. Father is described initially as more idealized. Both patients had two older brothers, one of whom at least was fairly disturbed. Both patients have a history of incestuous childhood “sexual molestation”: one by brother with the patient's participation, consciously remembered from the beginning of treatment; the other was with father as voyeur or more, dissociated memories recalled later in treatment. Both patients have inhibitions in assertion and in success in their fields, as well as interferences with sexual activity. Both came for treatment consciously looking for improvement in their career choices and personal relationships and both were eager for analysis. These curious similarities may have to do with the kind of patient that comes for analysis or the kind of patient we might be eager to take into analysis or present. However, the big difference between the patients involves their psychic organization. Case 1 seemed to be organized on a more neurotic character level with masochistic features, while case 2, I suspect, was functioning on a more primitive psychic organizational level with borderline features. This patient presents with intense performance anxiety to the point of forgetting the music and inability to perform.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.