Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Emanuel, L. (2002). Deprivation × 3: The contribution of Organizational Dynamics to the ‘Triple Deprivation’ of Looked-After Children. J. Child Psychother., 28(2):163-179.
    

(2002). Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 28(2):163-179

Deprivation × 3: The contribution of Organizational Dynamics to the ‘Triple Deprivation’ of Looked-After Children

Louise Emanuel

The author describes her experience of setting up a therapeutic service for ‘looked-after children’ in a social services department, and the change of approach from a focus on individual therapy to consultation and liaison with the network. The idea that children in the ‘care system’ suffer a triple deprivation when the ‘double deprivation’, as described by Henry (1974), is compounded by organizational difficulties, is explored. Material is presented of work with foster-parents which helped to prevent placement breakdown. The ways in which disturbing emotional states of clients are re-enacted within the organization are discussed. The author suggests that the paralysis in a social services system, which can lead to ‘drift’, resembles the ‘collapse of strategy’ of babies displaying a ‘disorganized/disoriented’ attachment response to a frightened or frightening mother. The need for a ‘secure base’ for social workers and their managers is stressed if they are to provide the same for their clients.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.