Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To restrict search results by languageā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Search Tool allows you to restrict your search by Language. PEP Web contains articles written in English, French, Greek, German, Italian, Spanish, and Turkish.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hoffman, L. (2010). The Impact of Opposite-Sex Younger Siblings: A Hypothesis Concerning Gender Differences. J. Infant Child Adolesc. Psychother., 9(2-3):68-85.

(2010). Journal of Infant, Child & Adolescent Psychotherapy, 9(2-3):68-85

The Impact of Opposite-Sex Younger Siblings: A Hypothesis Concerning Gender Differences

Leon Hoffman, M.D.

The first year of two psychoanalyses (a prelatency boy and a prelatency girl, both with opposite-sex younger siblings) is examined and compared using an approach to the psychoanalytic data similar to grounded theory. For the girl, her envy of her brother's penis seemed to be a response to her sense of abandonment by the mother. For the boy, the birth of his sister seemed to have triggered concern about the integrity of his body, although separation concerns were also present. The findings in these two cases are consistent with Phyllis Tyson's (1989, 1994) conjecture about the difference between boys and girls. Because of boys' body difference from mother, the threat to their body integrity (expressed as castration anxiety) is more common than in girls and begins with separationindividuation. In contrast, girls do not usually experience such concerns with their body integrity because their bodies are like mother. Intense penis envy that may be observed in girls is more reflective of the loss of the mother than an issue of concern about their body integrity. The implications of the contrast between the two cases are discussed.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.