Login
Charet, F.X. (1990). A Dialogue Between Psychology and Theology: The correspondence of C. G. Jung and Victor White. J. Anal. Psychol., 35:421-441.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1990). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 35:421-441

A Dialogue Between Psychology and Theology: The correspondence of C. G. Jung and Victor White

F. X. Charet, Ph.D. Author Information

Introduction

The dialogue between C. G. Jung and the Dominican theologian Victor White which began in 1945 and ended in 1960 is, in many respects, suggestive both with regard to Jung's views of the main tenets of Christianity, and in any attempt to foster a reconciliation between Jungian psychology and Christian theology. The dialogue also occurs during a most important period in the creative life of Jung. It was at this time that his later more mature and more theoretical works appeared. The most significant of these are his writings on Christianity and alchemy. In the case of the former A psychological approach to the dogma of the Trinity (Jung 12), Aion (Jung 13) and ‘Answer to Job’ (Jung 14) are directly relevant to the correspondence under discussion in that, to some extent, these works seem to have been fashioned into their final form as the result of Jung's exchange with White. At the same time it is the contents of these works that caused Jung and White to be so profoundly at odds with one another. Reading the Jung/White letters allows us to peer into the background of that controversy which raged about Jung's ‘Answer to Job’ where he, in effect, as one of my former professors put it, cornered God the Father, pinned him to the nearest couch and promptly set about psychoanalysing him. This resulted in Jung finding God guilty of being unconscious, having projected his shadow upon humanity, and of perpetuating a considerable amount of injustice and evil.

About three-quarters of the letters from Jung to White have been published with sufficient annotations on, or quotations from, White's letters to grasp his point of view. The remaining letters were omitted because they were either insufficiently important or of too personal a nature. It is my intention in this article to look briefly at the differences

- 421 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.