After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Source. This will rearrange the results of your search, displaying articles according to their appearance in journals and books. This feature is useful for tracing psychoanalytic concepts in a specific psychoanalytic tradition.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Hauke, C. (1996). Hillman, James. Healing Fiction. Dallas, TX: Spring Publications, 1994. 2nd ed. [Originally published: New York: Station Hill Publishers, 1983.] Pp. 145, Pbk $14.50.. J. Anal. Psychol., 41(3):450-452.
(1996). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 41(3):450-452
Hillman, James. Healing Fiction. Dallas, TX: Spring Publications, 1994. 2nd ed. [Originally published: New York: Station Hill Publishers, 1983.] Pp. 145, Pbk $14.50.
Review by: Christopher Hauke
I first read these three essays in 1989, and re—reading them for this review made me realize their influence, both upon my own orientation within analysis, but also upon ideas now being developed by others. For example, the function of narrative, the ‘case story’, in analysis; plurality of the psyche, multiplicity and fragmentation; and the debate over questions of the literal and the symbolic, and the aims of psychotherapy.
Quoting Jung, Hillman reminds us that although we all have psyches we are not all psychologists. We need to learn to listen to what the soul wants: ‘This suggests that a reason for psychotherapy of whatever school and for whatever complaint is to gain psychology - a logos of soul that is at the same moment a therapeia of soul. We need to gain the intelligent response that makes the soul intelligible… if logos is its therapy, because it articulates the psyche's wants, then one answer to what the soul wants is psychology’ (p. 94).
Hillman's three essays are based around the three seminal psychologies of Freud, Jung and Adler, examining each as different fictions that heal. In the essay entitled ‘What does the soul want? Adler's imagination of inferiority’, Hillman asserts that ‘the uncertainty about what the patient and I are really there for is in fact what we are really there for’ (p.86), and this inarticulate desire of the soul, this wanting in uncertainty, ‘makes us feel a woeful inferiority’ (p.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]