Login
Woodworth, V. (1996). Hillman, James ‘Pink madness, or Why does Aphrodite drive men crazy with pornography?’Spring, 57, 1995, 39-71.. J. Anal. Psychol., 41:474-475.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1996). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 41:474-475

Hillman, James ‘Pink madness, or Why does Aphrodite drive men crazy with pornography?’ Spring, 57, 1995, 39-71.

Vernon Woodworth Author Information

Archetypal analysis in Hillman's hands has become above all a matter of cultural criticism, a broad brush with which to paint sweeping statements and put forth provocative and polemical propositions. In this address which reflects its oral origins and retains its stand-up style, Hillman presents Aphrodite, the goddess of love, as subversively seeking her archetypal due in a culture which has systematically sought to shun her. No ceremony summons her, no dogma dignifies her, she is criticized on campus and abhorred in the work place: her feminine seductiveness is universally viewed with suspicion.

Despite this denigration and exclusion, Aphrodite has extended her influence through the compulsively sexualized behaviour of her son, Priapus. Priapus as the sexual grotesque arises from Hera's censorial intrauterine touch, for, from the point of view of the goddess of marriage, this child of extramarital conception must be made unseemly and repellent. Priapus becomes Hillman's metaphor for pornography in a culture which seeks to domesticate sex and repress Aphrodite's celebration of eroticism.

However, Aphrodite herself is appalled by her misshapen son. Hillman recognizes that the sexuality of Priapus expresses its own archetypal realm, distinct from the sweet lust and seductiveness of his mother, but he does not acknowledge the problem this creates for his argument. Priapian sexuality may well be the archetypal basis for the pornographic imagination, with its concomitant experiences

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.