Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To sort articles by Rankā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kalsched, D.E. (1998). Reply to Reid Anderson. J. Anal. Psychol., 43(4):597-599.

(1998). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43(4):597-599

Reply to Reid Anderson Related Papers

Donald E. Kalsched, Ph.D.

I suppose I asked for this. Instead of following the rules at last summer's Sebasco Conference where this paper was first delivered, and limiting myself to one or two analytic moments, I presumed to present evocative ‘flash-pictures’ of a whole 4-year analysis, in order to illustrate my pet theory about archetypal defences. I suspect the resulting picture was both too little and too much for some readers and listeners. Having thus ‘sown with the wind’ as proscribed by the old prophet Hosea (8: 7) I now reap the ‘whirlwind’ of misunderstanding in the form of Reid Anderson's overwrought response, masquerading as a ‘hope for further dialogue’.

I am afraid that dialogue is unlikely in this instance because Dr Anderson's hypothetical ‘case’ is not the case of Sue, my analysand, as I have known her. Rather it is a constructed caricature of a woman whose life is ‘progressively falling apart’, finally ‘in shambles’, with dreams ‘permeated by deranged and murderous figures’, in analysis with someone who has - because of inattention to transference/countertransference issues and an obsession with his own theory - colluded with the patient's compliant self while unconsciously retraumatizing her through a ruthless, insensitive pursuit of her unbearable affects, thus perpetrating a violent ‘anal penetration’ equivalent to her mother's traumatizing childhood enemas!

In this characterization, the victim/perpetrator defensive complex which I had hoped to illustrate as part of the patient's self-traumatizing inner world, is split asunder with the ‘bad’ perpetrator now once again ejected from the patient's psyche, in the form of someone ‘outside’ to blame - in this case the analyst himself.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.