Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Green, A. (1999). Consilience and Rigour Commentary by André Green. Neuropsychoanalysis, 1(1):40-44.

(1999). Neuropsychoanalysis, 1(1):40-44

Consilience and Rigour Commentary by André Green

André Green

A psychoanalyst, especially one who has advocated exchanging views with neurobiologists, should rejoice at reading a paper that recognizes the pertinence of Freud's work in this field, that agrees on the centrality of the pleasure-unpleasure principle, and accepts the idea that affects are ingrained in unconscious processes. Moreover, it is a paper that adopts the fundamental distinctions between inner and outer perceptual modalities, admits the usefulness of the idea of binding, and makes reference to id functions. It defends the long-term influence of affectivity, and is open to even some of Freud's most speculative views on the relationship of affect to phylogenesis (though interpreted differently). Finally, the neurobiologist acknowledges Freud's courage in probing “into these darker areas of the human psyche.” But beyond these general statements almost everything Freud wrote seems in fact very doubtful in the light of neuroscience.

The psychoanalyst may also find some relief when reading the criticisms that the neurobiologist addresses to his colleagues: They deliberately want to underestimate the importance of affect, they are caught in and proud of their ultrapositivistic ideology, they are deaf to higher integrative issues, they consider feelings as epiphenomenal flotsam, they are victims of their own blinders, and finally they are ruled by some unspoken prohibition on being interested in understanding the fundamental nature of affective experience. Having given such tokens of good will, Panksepp expects his psychoanalytic partners in the dialogue to make parallel criticisms in their own field.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.