Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access PEP-Web support…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you click on the banner at the top of the website, you will be brought to the page for PEP-Web support.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kinsbourne, M. (2000). The Mechanism of Confabulation Commentary by Marcel Kinsbourne. Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):158-162.

(2000). Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):158-162

The Mechanism of Confabulation Commentary by Marcel Kinsbourne

Marcel Kinsbourne, M.D.

Three Questions about Confabulation

Which brain structures are impaired in patients who confabulate? By what mechanism is the confabulation generated? What determines the content of the confabulation? DeLuca concentrates on the first question, and Solms on the last, with little overlap. I hope to find a common thread between them by addressing the middle question.

DeLuca offers a comprehensive discussion of the localization of brain pathology in confabulation. He concludes that confabulation is apt to arise when there is conjoint frontal (specifically ventromedial) dysfunction and impaired memory (due to basal forebrain, diencephalic, or mesial temporal damage). This conclusion is persuasive for the bulk of confabulation, which refers to events in the past, and on which DeLuca focuses. Confabulating about the present, and even the future, which is also well documented in the more severe cases, may not require defective memory. Does orbitofrontal dysfunction suffice to explain it?

Following structural lesions, disordered frontal function and impaired memory are constant and persistent, but confabulation comes and goes. Confabulators only sometimes confabulate, and only on some topics. Confabulations may be offered spontaneously, but more often they are uttered only when they are provoked by leading questions. The suggested mechanisms for confabulation that DeLuca briefly summarizes, impaired self-monitoring and strategic retrieval (Moscovitch and Mello, 1997), may be too much of an explanation for the syndrome.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.