Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Watt, D.F. (2000). The Dialogue between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience: Alienation and Reparation. Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):183-192.

(2000). Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):183-192

The Dialogue between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience: Alienation and Reparation

Douglas F. Watt, Ph.D.

The irony regarding the historical alienation of psychoanalysis and neuroscience, of which virtually everyone is aware, is that Freud started out as a very competent neurologist who made several important contributions to the neurological literature of his time, including work on aphasia. His “Project for a Scientific Psychology(1895) was his attempt to give psychoanalytic metapsychology the firm grounding in neuroscience that Freud thought critical to its scientific validity. Virtually everyone is also aware that the Project failed simply because the neuroscience of Freud's day did not have the concepts to provide any such grounding. The Project ended up being a kind of backwards construction, speculating about largely undiscovered brain processes that would be isomorphic with the psychological principles of consciousness and unconsciousness that Freud was intuitively developing.

Despite this important starting point, psychoanalysis and neuroscience gradually became virtual adversaries during the second half of the twentieth century. This happened after decades of hegemony of psychoanalysis in American psychiatry departments, in the context of a fundamental conceptual split between psychiatry and neurology mostly organized around the now fortunately outdated distinction between “functional” and “organic.” Although psychiatry and neurology have finally moved into an increasingly productive dialogue over the last two decades, there has been a much more limited movement toward respectful dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience, and precious few of those limited initiatives have come from the neuroscience side of the fence.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.