Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see statistics of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Statistics of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP-Web can be reviewed at any time. Just click the “See full statistics” link located at the end of the Most Popular Journal Articles list in the PEP Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ostow, M. (2000). J. Allan Hobson and Edward Pace-Schott's Response Commentary by Mortimer Ostow. Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):214-216.

(2000). Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):214-216

J. Allan Hobson and Edward Pace-Schott's Response Commentary by Mortimer Ostow Related Papers

Mortimer Ostow, M.D.

I am impelled to respond to Hobson's essay and his and Pace-Schott's subsequent reply to Solms, Braun, Reiser, Nersessian, and Gilmore. This exchange is seriously compromised by Hobson's failure to decouple his discussion of the neurophysiology of dreams—actually the neurophysiology of REM—from his vendetta against Freud and Freudians. He provides friendly advice to Freudians to drop a number of their favorite positions. I adduce here two clinical examples which I think might convince any reasonable observer of the validity of the concept of latent content, and in the latter case, that the understanding of latent content can be lifesaving.

The patient is a 37-year-old woman who started treatment with me 12 years ago while she was in a state of shock, immediately after she had been informed that her father had killed himself by jumping from a bridge. Shortly after I had read Hobson's essay and his reply to the commentaries in the second issue of Neuro-Psychoanalysis, she reported the following dream: I am standing in front of the kitchen cupboard and my husband hands me a dish. He puts it in-my hand. I am afraid of breaking it.

This woman had been married just 6 weeks previously and was now troubled by her husband's frequent use of politically incorrect language and opinions in relation to the relative status of men and women. She felt that in reality he loved and respected her. He was basically a decent person but given to derogatory comments about various individuals and groups.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.