Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2000). The Gap between Two Creative Traditions: Experimental Psychology and Psychoanalysis Commentary by Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber. Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):234-238.

(2000). Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):234-238

The Gap between Two Creative Traditions: Experimental Psychology and Psychoanalysis Commentary by Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber Related Papers

Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber

It was a pleasure for me as a psychoanalyst to read Paul Whittle's paper. Here is an experimental psychologist asking himself why psychoanalysis and his branch of psychology are ignoring each other, more or less, constituting a gap between the two disciplines.His interest in psychoanalysis is especially unusual, against the background of the present zeitgeist which Jonathan Lear (1995), professor of philosophy at Yale, characterized as “Freud bashing.” Whittle, in opposition to this zeitgeist, wants to analyze some of the reasons for the lack of scientific exchange between the two disciplines.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.