Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To report problems to PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Help us improve PEP Web. If you find any problem, click the Report a Problem link located at the bottom right corner of the website.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Whittle, P. (2000). Response to Commentaries Paul Whittle. Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):259-264.

(2000). Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):259-264

Response to Commentaries Paul Whittle Related Papers

Paul Whittle

Several commentators expressed their heartfelt recognition of the personal situation I described, that of taking psychoanalysis seriously in a university department of psychology. We should not lose sight of how extraordinary it is that serious discussion of the past century's most influential current of psychological thought should be almost taboo in such departments. Oliver Turnbull, in his perceptive description of the occasion of my lecture, nicely describes his anxiety (which I shared) about its reception in the supposedly friendly atmosphere of the weekly departmental seminar.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.