Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kinsbourne, M. (2004). Commentary on “The Pleasantness of False Beliefs”. Neuropsychoanalysis, 6(1):33-37.

(2004). Neuropsychoanalysis, 6(1):33-37

Commentary on “The Pleasantness of False Beliefs” Related Papers

Marcel Kinsbourne, M.D.

Confabulation: A Psychic Wonderland?

“Will you, won't you, will you, won't you, will you join the dance?”

Lewis Caroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

The question

Brain damage may drive mental life either outward or inward, to join or not to join the Dance. In the latter case, it may unveil an underlying level of mental function that previously was covert. With that possibility in mind for the genesis of confabulations, Turnbull, Jenkins, and Rowley present an innovative study of the emotional valence of confabulations uttered by three patients with ventromesial frontal injury. They nest their empirical presentation in a more extensive discussion of method and theory.

Confabulation has been defined as “spontaneous narrative reports of events that never happened” (Schacter, Norman, & Koutstaal, 1998). This definition has to be qualified by the fact that the event may be in the present or future, as well as in the past (for a recent and comprehensive review, see Schnider, 2003). Whether the patients really believe what they are saying or are instead speaking metaphorically is hard to ascertain, and not part of the definition. However, the patients are not merely misinformed, and conscious attempts to deceive are also excluded from the construct.

Confabulation is associated with organic amnesia, prefrontal deficits, or both in conjunction (DeLuca, 2000). In some cases, it reflects flawed emergence of language at the level of which concepts are specified in that domain (Brown, 1988).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.