Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Turnbull, O. (2004). Response to Commentaries. Neuropsychoanalysis, 6(1):39-45.

(2004). Neuropsychoanalysis, 6(1):39-45

Response to Commentaries Related Papers

Oliver Turnbull

Many a Foolish Notion: Emotion and Confabulation

My thanks, first, to the commentators for taking the time and effort to respond.

Empiricism and quantification

The question of empiricism and quantification ran through the commentaries as a common, and generally positive, theme. Almost all the commentators appeared to welcome the fact that evidence generated in a psychoanalytic context should be tackled in a manner that suggested a desire to measure phenomena in a tractable manner, and with a reasonable level of experimental control. There was, of course, some disagreement about the specifics of how this was achieved (e.g., Blechner, DeLuca, Schnider, and others). For example, several commentators raised, quite rightly, matters related to sampling and control in the study: why this series of patients, and which criteria were employed in selecting them; why were the patients not worked up in greater detail in terms of their performance in conventional neuropsychological assessment, and their everyday behavior not documented in greater detail; why were there not more appropriate control groups?

Answers to these questions follow, in large part, from an understanding of the nature and purpose of the study. The study was conducted post hoc, as a reinvestigation of previously studied cases. Our goal was not to investigate confabulations in the manner expected of an entirely conventional neuropsychological study. This would have required a more systematic neuropsychological work-up of the patient, a betterdesigned method for ensuring that all possible confabulations were evaluated, and the addition of a control group.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.