Login
Cartwright, R. (2006). Commentary on “Freudian Dream Theory, Dream Bizarreness, and the Disguise-Censor Controversy”. Neuropsychoanalysis, 8:20-23.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2006). Neuropsychoanalysis, 8:20-23

Commentary on “Freudian Dream Theory, Dream Bizarreness, and the Disguise-Censor Controversy” Related Papers

Rosalind Cartwright Author Information

One of Freud's explanations for why dreams are difficult to understand is that this is due to their representing a compromise between a primitive wish and learned inhibitions to their expression. This is challenged by current research from brain-imaging studies, studies of memory consolidation and dream function. Recent evidence appears to support not a conflict but a continuity of emotional/cognitive concerns across the wake-sleep cycle, with little evidence of motivated

- 20 -

distortion. Dreaming is an opportunity to observe the formation of connections between present and past organizing structures we bring to interpreting current experience.

In the target article in this issue, Simon Boag takes up a debate between those neuroscientists who have critiqued Freud's explanation of why dreams are difficult to understand and some responses to these challenges by psychoanalytic theorists. The author clarifies a distinction between two mechanisms that Freud had suggested as responsible for the bizarreness of dreams. The first is that dreams are disguised in order to circumvent a vigilant censor. This implied the presence of an active control system to prevent unacceptable wishes from reaching awareness. The author agrees that this dream “dictator” is difficult to locate and thus to support. However, the second explanation Freud offered—that dreams are bizarre because they represent a compromise between two competing motives—is one that Boag suggests has

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.