Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Cartwright, R. (2006). Commentary on “Freudian Dream Theory, Dream Bizarreness, and the Disguise-Censor Controversy”. Neuropsychoanalysis, 8(1):20-23.

(2006). Neuropsychoanalysis, 8(1):20-23

Commentary on “Freudian Dream Theory, Dream Bizarreness, and the Disguise-Censor Controversy” Related Papers

Rosalind Cartwright

One of Freud's explanations for why dreams are difficult to understand is that this is due to their representing a compromise between a primitive wish and learned inhibitions to their expression. This is challenged by current research from brain-imaging studies, studies of memory consolidation and dream function. Recent evidence appears to support not a conflict but a continuity of emotional/cognitive concerns across the wake-sleep cycle, with little evidence of motivated

- 20 -

distortion. Dreaming is an opportunity to observe the formation of connections between present and past organizing structures we bring to interpreting current experience.

In the target article in this issue, Simon Boag takes up a debate between those neuroscientists who have critiqued Freud's explanation of why dreams are difficult to understand and some responses to these challenges by psychoanalytic theorists. The author clarifies a distinction between two mechanisms that Freud had suggested as responsible for the bizarreness of dreams. The first is that dreams are disguised in order to circumvent a vigilant censor. This implied the presence of an active control system to prevent unacceptable wishes from reaching awareness. The author agrees that this dream “dictator” is difficult to locate and thus to support. However, the second explanation Freud offered—that dreams are bizarre because they represent a compromise between two competing motives—is one that Boag suggests has

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.