Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by author…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

While performing a search, you can sort the articles by Author in the Search section. This will rearrange the results of your search alphabetically according to the author’s surname. This feature is useful to quickly locate the work of a specific author.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Panksepp, J. (2008). Commentary on “Is There a Drive to Love?”. Neuropsychoanalysis, 10(2):166-169.
    

(2008). Neuropsychoanalysis, 10(2):166-169

Commentary on “Is There a Drive to Love?” Related Papers

Jaak Panksepp

Seeking the Epigenesis of Romantic Love

Yoram Yovell provides an intriguing analysis of the web of linkages among love, sexuality, and attachments, as he probes the currently irresolvable question of whether there is an intrinsic drive in the human brain/mind for “romantic love.” He cautiously and appropriately concludes that romantic love probably emerges from our more primitive urges for sexuality and social attachments, without falling into the pit of ruthless reductionism that is so common in neuro-science these days. In pursuing the rational middle ground, he provides an intriguing essay on the search for the roots of love through modern brain imaging. His analysis is uniquely integrated with a vision of primary-process mammalian emotions and motives arising from a cross-species affective neuroscience.

Yovell's reading of the evidence, as opposed to the hubris of theoretical speculation common in this field, leads him to conclude that those who have been willing to posit “romantic love” as a primary drive may be adding one too many evolutionary horses in front of the cart of our fundamental social motivations. While I largely agree, I would also like to add the intellectual spice of a few modest qualifications. As I highlighted in Affective Neuroscience, two of the major emotional forces for adult love surely arise from our LUST and CARE systems, leading often to confusions and to gender-typical cross-currents about the varieties of human love (Panksepp, 1998).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.