Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To limit search results by article type…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for an Abstract? Article? Review? Commentary? You can choose the type of document to be displayed in your search results by using the Type feature of the Search Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tsakiris, M. (2013). Self-Specificity of the External Body. Neuropsychoanalysis, 15(1):66-69.

(2013). Neuropsychoanalysis, 15(1):66-69

Self-Specificity of the External Body Related Papers

Commentary by Manos Tsakiris

Mark Solms suggests that the internal body, equated with the id and represented at the brainstem structures, gives us the self-as-subject consciousness, while the external body, equated with the ego, is represented as an object, analogous to any other object in the world. Is memory space the sole, or at least the most important, contribution that the ego can make to the id? I would like to argue that it is not. Even though the basis of phenomenal consciousness—the “being-me” state—might be given by the brainstem consciousness, the most important function of the ego is precisely that it can represent my body as an object and identify it with the internal body. Thus, both bodies need to be represented as self-specific, and inevitably this will require the contribution of a cortical network. Both the ego and the id, in Solms's terms, co-constitute self-specificity.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.