Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To refine search by publication year…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having problems finding an article? Writing the year of its publication in Search for Words or Phrases in Context will help narrow your search.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Solms, M. (2013). Response to Commentaries. Neuropsychoanalysis, 15(1):79-85.

(2013). Neuropsychoanalysis, 15(1):79-85

Response to Commentaries Related Papers

Mark Solms

The Id is Not the Same as the Unconscious … and other Things

I am of course pleased by the substantial degree of agreement with my main conclusions. Due to limitations of space, I will focus on the points of disagreement.

Ariane Bazan says I have conflated affect and drive (i.e., Trieb, which Strachey called “instinct”). She also thinks that I confuse drive and instinct, in the modern sense of the word. First, let me say that I did not intend to do so, because I do not consider these things to be synonymous at all. I define drive as “a measure of the demand made upon the mind for work in consequence of its connection with the body” (Freud, 1915a, p. 122), where the “measure” is the degree of deviation from a homeostatic set-point (with implications for survival and reproductive success). I do not believe that this deviation itself is something mental, but the “demand” it generates is felt in the pleasure-unpleasure series. This (felt demand) is affect, which in my view is the origin of mind. The “work” that flows from affect is cognition, the functional purpose of which is to reduce affect—that is, to reduce prediction error (free energy).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.