Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save a shortcut to an article to your desktop…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The way you save a shortcut to an article on your desktop depends on what internet browser (and device) you are using.

  • Safari
  • Chrome
  • Internet Explorer
  • Opera


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

(2018). Part Two—Menzies Meets Douglas and a Case Study. Organ. Soc. Dyn., 18(2):247-272.

(2018). Organizational and Social Dynamics, 18(2):247-272

Part Two—Menzies Meets Douglas and a Case Study

Part One explored several concepts that can build the sociological foundations of Menzies' social defence theory (SDT). Its purpose is to improve the prospects of organisational change. It included Durkheim's sociology, Freud's revised theory of anxiety, systemic self-organisation and feedback loops, and the distinction between social forms and content. In this article, Mary Douglas' (1986) institutional theory of culture, is employed alongside Menzies to reconceptualise social defences as informal institutions displaying distinct social forms, that generate feedback loops, or consequences for individuals and the organisation. Trist's (1950) culture as a “mediating” psycho-social “concept” brings Menzies and Douglas into dialogue. This suggests that both macro-sociological forms and micro-psychological insight into behaviour are needed. A four-year consultancy with a medium-sized multinational manufacturing company where social defences appeared but traditional Tavistock style action research interventions failed is presented as a case study. This forced a rethinking of consultant task and intervention, and research diagnosis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2017 and more current articles see the publishers official website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.