Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To keep track of most popular articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always keep track of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP Web by checking the PEP tab found on the homepage.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

(1949). Joint Meetings of the Los Angeles and San Francisco Psychoanalytic Societies. Psychoanal Q., 18:414-415.

(1949). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 18:414-415

Joint Meetings of the Los Angeles and San Francisco Psychoanalytic Societies

February 17, 1949. CULTURE AND CLINIC. Marvin K. Opler, Ph.D.

Psychoanalysis and cultural anthropology are, and should be, intimately related. Both deal with man and with his behavior as a cultural being. But the manner in which they are properly related must be consistent with the best information and the best tenets of each field. In the first quarter of the century, this relationship left much to be desired. In the main, it fell into two phases: first, a period of evolutionary anthropology, old style, in which, in Spencer for example, civilization was seen as in part being a race evolution, a working out of psychic energies from primitive times in response to what Spencer called 'internal, original factors' (psychogenetic factors in evolution) beginning with an 'infantile, emotional, magic-ridden primitive'. This primitive had never been found, but he provided a comparison with individual clinical cases, ontogenetically understood, and by imputation, a parallel phylogeny.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.