Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one).  Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper.  Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Herold, C.M. (1949). Social Disorganization: By Robert E. L. Faris. New York: The Ronald Press Co., 1948. 481 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 18:524-525.

(1949). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 18:524-525

Social Disorganization: By Robert E. L. Faris. New York: The Ronald Press Co., 1948. 481 pp.

Review by:
Carl M. Herold

'Social disorganization' is defined as 'a disturbance in the patterns and mechanisms of human relations, as distinguished from other disturbances' of societies based on catastrophes like famine, epidemics, etc., which as such need not necessarily produce social disorganization. In a footnote (p. 21) the theoretical criticism that the judgment whether certain social mechanisms are functioning satisfactorily (the diagnosis whether a state of social disorganization exists in certain social mechanisms is dependent on 'arbitrary moral approval or disapproval') is dismissed with the remark that all concepts referring to human behavior are necessarily relative in character, and that refusing to operate with such concepts would make study of human behavior impossible. The reviewer feels that this is only partly true, and that the real objection in the above-mentioned criticism is not the relativity of such concepts, but their subjectivity. Our suspicion about the scientific approach of the author is increased when we read such sentences as 'A decline of sacredness [of social institutions] opens the way to disorganization' instead of the statement that such decline is merely a symptom of disorganization (p. 29).

The author undertakes to investigate the 'nature' of social disorganization 'as the physician studies anatomy and physiology' (p. 4) in order to prescribe an effective treatment of the social illness. But by relegating the investigation of the causes of social disintegration to the field of the economist, Faris merely studies the symptomatology of the social disease, and therefore can only

- 524 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.