Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kanzer, M. (1956). Freud on Broadway. A History of Psychoanalysis and the American Drama: By W. David Sievers. New York: Hermitage House, Inc., 1955. 479 PP.. Psychoanal Q., 25:100-101.

(1956). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 25:100-101

Freud on Broadway. A History of Psychoanalysis and the American Drama: By W. David Sievers. New York: Hermitage House, Inc., 1955. 479 PP.

Review by:
Mark Kanzer

Sievers offers the reader a pleasant and informative, although sometimes unreliable, tour of the modern drama. Despite his amateurish equipment, he succeeds to a certain extent in a sincere and enthusiastic endeavor to demonstrate freudian mechanisms at work backstage in the American theater.

Credit for the first consciously freudian drama is given to Arthur Hopkins, whose Fatted Calf appeared in 1912. Just why Hopkins should be so credited is not clear; the play dealt with the hypnotherapy of a girl obsessed by fear of her mother. 'Mother love', it is interesting to note, was already being viewed with scepticism and was described as claiming 'more victims every day than all the pestilences of the earth combined'.

By 1916, the 'little theater movement' was clearly infused with the new psychology (which one discerning critic suspected of being an instrument of pro-German war propaganda). In 1919, Heywood Broun lamented that a drama critic was no longer properly qualified unless he had been initiated into the secrets of Dr. Freud. Another columnist demanded that Freud and the horrors of the unconscious be kept off the stage and confined to the limits of the printed page, 'where they belong'.

Thereafter, according to Sievers, Freud became the tacit collaborator of almost all outstanding American playwrights. Unfortunately for those with a pedantic inclination to insist on the facts, this claim does not seem to be based on adequate evidence.

This book is the outgrowth of a doctor's dissertation at the University of Southern California. Yet the research upon which it is based, in so far as it is disclosed, must be described as inadequate to support the conclusions. Thirty-three American playwrights responded to a questionnaire by Dr. Sievers. We are given, however, no systematic description of the questionnaire or of the responses.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.