Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: Understanding Rank

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you do a search, you can sort the results bibliographically alphabetical or by “rank”. What is Rank?

Rank refers to the search engine’s “best guess” as to the relevance of the result to the search you specified. The exact method of ranking used varies a bit depending on the search. In its most basic level, when you specify a single search term, rank looks at the density of the matches for the word in the document, and how close to the beginning of the document they appear as a measure of importance to the paper’s topic. The documents with the most matches and where the term is deemed to have the most importance, have the highest “relevance” and are ranked first (presented first).

When you specify more than one term to appear anywhere in the article, the method is similar, but the search engine looks at how many of those terms appear, and how close together they appear, how close to the beginning of the document, and can even take into account the relative rarity of the search terms and their density in the retrieved file, where infrequent terms count more heavily than common terms.

To see a simple example of this, search for the words (not the phrase, so no quotes):

unconscious communications

Look at the density of matches in each document on the first page of the hits. Then go to the last page of matched documents, and observe the density of matches within the documents.

A more complex search illustrates this nicely with a single page and only 15 matches:

counter*tr* w/25 “liv* out” w/25 enact*

There are a lot of word forms and variants of the words (due to the * wildcards) above that can match, but the proximity (w/25) clause limits the potential for matching. What’s interesting here though is how easily you can see the match density decrease as you view down the short list.

The end result of selecting order by rank is that the search engine’s best “guess” as to which articles are more relevant appear higher on the list than less relevant articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

(1956). International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XXXV, 1954: Psychoanalysis and the History of Art. E. H. Gombrich. Pp. 401-411.. Psychoanal Q., 25:280.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XXXV, 1954: Psychoanalysis and the History of Art. E. H. Gombrich. Pp. 401-411.

(1956). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 25:280

International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XXXV, 1954: Psychoanalysis and the History of Art. E. H. Gombrich. Pp. 401-411.

Ernest Jones once wrote that symbolism comprises almost the whole development of civilization: 'A never-ending series of evolutionary substitutions, a ceaseless replacement of one idea, interest, capacity or tendency by another'. In the dim beginnings of art, a symbol was not experienced as a symbol, but rather as the reality itself, just as to the young child a doll is not a symbol of a baby, but rather is a real baby. Art grows and matures not by external accretions (such as technical improvement) but by a constant extension and modification of symbols. The representational stereotypes of primitive culture invoke the pleasure principle through repetition and emphasis on similarities rather than differences. The sophisticated, however, seek more difficult gratifications. To the degree that art is too direct, too obvious, too cloyingly sweet, it departs from symbolic representation and becomes less appealing. Purely surface appeal (photos of pin-up girls) does not permit the audience to share in an artist's imaginative process: where representational accuracy is the cardinal emphasis, the image is too easy to read, 'we find repellent what yields too obvious, too childish gratification. It invites to regression and we feel not secure enough to yield.' On the other hand, Impressionism, which requires an effort at shared activity, 'yields a wonderful premium of regressive pleasure'. In Cubism, similarly, the primary process comes into full play, 'anything is possible in this crazy world'.

The artist's unconscious and his conflicts resemble those of the world around him, and he has special gifts. What is important is the social context in which he works and to which he offers his work: the style, the trend of the people creates a sounding board in the reverberations of which the artist's private and personal meaning is all but swallowed up. We should therefore speak of resonance with the artist rather than of communication from him. It is questionable whether art is accessible to psychological analysis. The real work of art achieves more than the satisfaction of a few analyzable cravings. It is 'the highest type of organization of countless pulls and counterpulls on a hierarchy of levels' that baffles efforts at analysis.

- 280 -

Article Citation

(1956). International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XXXV, 1954. Psychoanal. Q., 25:280

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.