Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Beres, D. (1967). Hysteria. The History of a Disease: By Ilza Veith. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965. 301 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 36:284-287.

(1967). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 36:284-287

Hysteria. The History of a Disease: By Ilza Veith. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965. 301 pp.

Review by:
David Beres

The author of this book gives us both more and less than the title implies. She gives us more in her informative details about attitudes and theories concerning mental illness (not of hysteria alone) from antiquity to the present; but she gives us less because we are offered only history of the theories about hysteria, not of the disease itself.

A historical survey of a medical theme may compare the clinical descriptions of the disease being studied; but can we from the clinical descriptions of Hippocrates, Galen, Sydenham, Pinel, or even contemporary observers, be sure that the patients they describe have similar psychodynamic conflicts? The concept of a disease entity depends to a great extent on the theoretical orientation of the observer and this has varied enormously in regard to hysteria, as Dr. Veith makes clear. What has been called hysteria in past eras is surely not in all cases what is today so diagnosed.

Have the manifestations of hysteria varied over the centuries? The answer to this important question would indicate to us the influence on personality of social and economic factors in different historical periods. Psychoanalysts must someday study the historical question how men have dealt with their basic conflicts. The difficulties of such a study are obvious. If what we seek is the psychodynamic basis of the phenomena so vividly described in the writings of the past, we shall have to accept the limitations that accompany any attempt to reconstruct the past.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.