Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: Understanding Rank

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you do a search, you can sort the results bibliographically alphabetical or by “rank”. What is Rank?

Rank refers to the search engine’s “best guess” as to the relevance of the result to the search you specified. The exact method of ranking used varies a bit depending on the search. In its most basic level, when you specify a single search term, rank looks at the density of the matches for the word in the document, and how close to the beginning of the document they appear as a measure of importance to the paper’s topic. The documents with the most matches and where the term is deemed to have the most importance, have the highest “relevance” and are ranked first (presented first).

When you specify more than one term to appear anywhere in the article, the method is similar, but the search engine looks at how many of those terms appear, and how close together they appear, how close to the beginning of the document, and can even take into account the relative rarity of the search terms and their density in the retrieved file, where infrequent terms count more heavily than common terms.

To see a simple example of this, search for the words (not the phrase, so no quotes):

unconscious communications

Look at the density of matches in each document on the first page of the hits. Then go to the last page of matched documents, and observe the density of matches within the documents.

A more complex search illustrates this nicely with a single page and only 15 matches:

counter*tr* w/25 “liv* out” w/25 enact*

There are a lot of word forms and variants of the words (due to the * wildcards) above that can match, but the proximity (w/25) clause limits the potential for matching. What’s interesting here though is how easily you can see the match density decrease as you view down the short list.

The end result of selecting order by rank is that the search engine’s best “guess” as to which articles are more relevant appear higher on the list than less relevant articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

(1967). International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XLVI, 1965: A Clinical Type of Male Homosexuality. René de Monchy. Pp. 218-225.. Psychoanal Q., 36:318.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XLVI, 1965: A Clinical Type of Male Homosexuality. René de Monchy. Pp. 218-225.

(1967). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 36:318

International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XLVI, 1965: A Clinical Type of Male Homosexuality. René de Monchy. Pp. 218-225.

A type of practicing homosexual encountered fairly frequently differs from the 'normal' type in lack of a passive attitude. Instead, he is rather independent, headstrong, opinionated, and hard to influence. From early youth the woman is experienced as dangerous, domineering, and castrating. In the anamnesis the father-figure is missing in childhood, suggestively feminine behavior is present, strikingly high cultural standards are contrasted with crude, reckless homosexual practices, and there is a feeling of being 'out of it' with the social environment. A wide variety of abilities sometimes leading to too much versatility can result in failure of achievement. In the analytic relationship these patients show a somewhat irritating tendency to contradict, complain that they are not getting what they rightly deserve, and cannot easily tolerate the silent analyst who, like the father, gives them too little. Diagnostically they lie between perversion and obsessional neurosis. Prospects of heterosexuality are not good, but it is possible to achieve a happier life by smoother adaptation and better control of reckless behavior.

- 318 -

Article Citation

(1967). International Journal of Psychoanalysis. XLVI, 1965. Psychoanal. Q., 36:318

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.