Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article.  Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tausk, V. (1969). On the Psychology of the War Deserter. Psychoanal Q., 38:354-381.

(1969). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 38:354-381

On the Psychology of the War Deserter

Victor Tausk, M.D.

I

What I have to say on this subject is bound to be restricted in some respects by the circumstance that this is not a suitable time for discussing military institutions or political conditions. The military view of the deserter differs from the psychologist's, who is not concerned with whether or not the consequences that follow from his investigations harmonize with the requirements of the army, or the political situation.

As I know from fristhand experience, the attitude of patriotism in arms to the crime of desertion is pretty candidly based on the theory of deterrence. It follows from this practical principle that when deserters are tried in court psychological considerations will be taken into account only in exceptional cases, that is, when the judge has an overwhelming impression that the accused is mentally ill. The extent to which this impression will depend on the personal qualities of the judge, who will rarely have had psychiatric training, is easy to foresee. For the same reason it is impossible to count on al the mentally ill and only these being sent for psychiatric examination. Also I found plenty of confirmation for my supposition that men not submitted for psychiatric examination were sentenced after being declared fit to stand trial on the same shaky grounds as those on which others were sent to the psychiatrist as being mentally ill, or suspected of being mentally ill.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.