Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Waldhorn, H.F. (1973). Immediate Effects on Patients of Psychoanalytic Interpretations. Psychological Issues, Vol. VII, No. 4, Monograph 28: By Edith Levitov Garduk and Ernest A. Haggard. New York: International Universities Press, Inc., 1972. 84 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 42:627-629.

(1973). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 42:627-629

Immediate Effects on Patients of Psychoanalytic Interpretations. Psychological Issues, Vol. VII, No. 4, Monograph 28: By Edith Levitov Garduk and Ernest A. Haggard. New York: International Universities Press, Inc., 1972. 84 pp.

Review by:
Herbert F. Waldhorn

This monograph reports on an experimental study replete with statistical analyses, a carefully prepared methodology, and precisely defined hypotheses to be tested. Its value is admittedly limited by the smallness of the sample (material drawn from four cases), but its major faults derive from the incorrect or inadequate theoretical and clinical understanding underlying the approach.

The material studied came from typescripts of tape recordings or filmed records of two analyses and two psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapies. The verbal responses of patients in the five minutes following an intervention, considered to be an interpretation by a consensus of objective evaluators, were compared with the five minutes of responses which followed a noninterpretive intervention offered earlier in the same therapy session. While the authors were aware of the probable relevance of nonverbal responses and of the contribution made to any communication by tone of voice, nuances of timing, accent, gesture, and the like, they regretted that their technique could not record or measure such variables.

More critical is the omission of any reference to the preceding therapeutic developments or extra-analytic life experiences related to the session and the interventions studied, and to the content and transference significance of the material under discussion—in short, to all of the phenomena we have in mind when we note that responses to interpretations are overdetermined.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.